Creators Blog Monetization & Paywalls

What Does a “Normal” Paywall Actually Look Like? (Benchmarks)

Every indie founder looks at big-app paywalls and wonders: should mine look like that? The answer is usually: closer than you think, but not for the reasons you’d expect.

Based on RevenueCat’s 2026 benchmark data covering 115,000+ apps, here’s what most paywalls actually look like across categories.

The structure

Most paywalls show two plans. Two-plan paywalls dominate at 41–60% across all categories. Health & Fitness leads at 60% two-plan. If you’re showing three plans, you’re in the minority — and three plans work best when the middle one is clearly the target (see the article on plan structure).

Scrollable paywalls are the standard. 59–76% of paywalls are scrollable rather than static. Travel apps lead at 76% scrollable. Photo & Video is the lowest at 59% — but still the majority. A single static screen with all information is the exception, not the rule.

Annual plans appear most often. Annual plans show up on 28–44% of paywalls across categories. Health & Fitness leads at 44%. Weekly plans vary widely by category — Photo & Video apps show weekly plans 33% of the time, while Travel shows them only 10.5%.

The UI elements

What almost everyone has: Highlighted pricing (74.5% median — essentially a baseline expectation), multiple plan options displayed (59.2% median), a feature list (57% median), free trial messaging (54% median).

What about half of apps have: Discount badge (41% median), cancel assurance (“cancel anytime” language) (34% median).

What almost nobody has: Countdown timer at 1.4% of paywalls. Despite being widely discussed in conversion rate optimization content, almost no legitimate app uses them. Progress bars at 0.2% — essentially absent.

The implication: if your paywall doesn’t have a countdown timer, you’re in the 98.6% of apps. This is the standard. Countdown timers are the exception, used almost exclusively by apps that lean into pressure tactics — which is why when users see one, it often reads as suspicious.

Text density

Most paywalls are text-heavy. High text density (information-rich, explanation-forward copy) accounts for 45–63% of paywalls across categories. Gaming leads at 63%. Photo & Video is the exception — it uses the most low-density (visual-forward) paywalls at 27%.

This runs counter to the common advice to “keep your paywall minimal.” The data says users in most categories want information before they pay.

CTA language

The most common call-to-action button text across all apps: “Continue.” Not “Subscribe,” not “Start Free Trial,” not “Unlock.” Just “Continue.”

This makes sense behaviorally. “Continue” implies the user is already on a journey. They’re not making a new decision; they’re taking the next logical step. “Subscribe” and “Start Free Trial” follow. “Cancel Anytime” appears prominently as trust-building text alongside the primary CTA.

What this means for your paywall

Your paywall doesn’t need to be creative to convert. The median experience that works is: scrollable, two plans, annual plan highlighted, feature list present, “cancel anytime” visible, and a “Continue” button. That’s it.

The variation that actually moves conversion is in the copy and in the plan structure — whether the recommended plan feels like the obvious choice for someone like this user.

Benchmark quick reference

Sources

Benchmark data tells you what’s standard. Good design tells you what’s right for your specific app and user. I help indie founders find that combination.

Get in touch

← Previous